Portail documentaire Université Mohamed Khider Biskra

جماليات تلقي ديوان اللهب المقدس لمفدي زكرياء

Consultable

Titre :	جماليات تلقي ديوان اللهب المقدس لمفدي زكرياء
Auteurs :	صفية علية ; دليلة عالية علي, Directeur de thèse
Support:	Mémoire magistere
Editeur :	Biskra [Algerie] : Université Mohamed Khider, 2006
Langues:	Arabe
Résumé :	I finish my research by summing up all the preceding elements. Of course, by applying all principles of aesthetic reception on “THE SACRED FLAME», written by MOUFDI ZAKARIA that I see in a great importance as well as a further objective of the different readings of the same text. so that, it seems to me all various expressible imaginary spheres imposed on the learner, it rather transmits a message of a rebellion, among many Algerians, to his own people. Because messages can only express one meaning, the terms differ according to the linguist. The mental background of the text learner,therefore,determines the dimensions of reading, using specific methods of various type of learning that deal with one meaning. Each reading, among the following indicated by MOUHAMED NASER, MD.N.BOUHADGEME,YAHIA EL-SHIGH,HAOUAS BERRI,KHLIFA BOUDJADI,MD.ZARHINA….and others. each one of them gives a new cloth to the volume» THE SACRED FLAME» as well as a distinct aesthetic views taking in account that all are united in meaning. However, they depend in its assess mental applications, on the same artistic mental critical norms considering the volume» THE SACRED FLAME» as an aesthetic phenomenon expressed the explicit fact of the Algerian revolution in a language that is fundamentally violent, strong that is generally against”injustice”.so it respected the common norms of the principles and values of free peoples. But it penetrates, at that time , linguistically same common expressions, therefore, Zachariah’s language could have another face of expression. And to achieve all spheres of his readers(audience) by unusual words, unfamiliar expressions in custom of criticism. “THE SACRED FLAME” has never been in a need to a intervening reader or innovator one. But rather needs a tasteful reader; cultivated and receives meaning with intensity ebulliency of a rebellion, who melt in a recordable history, and this reader was never been in need to be confused by significance, unexpected spheres. this dark imaginary world has no explicit, fixed dimensions that are needed in aesthetic reception to achieve the literary character of the text by reaching to the further reader. “THE SACRED FLAME», realized a balance in that it gathers between the Classicism and modernism; is just an explicit literary message ,but rather is linguistically remains within the familiar scope.REOUIBI SALAH said once in his speech quoted from» REPUBLIC MAGASINE” in16/03/1986,inspired from words of MOUHAMED AAISSA’sbook(page09):(moufdi Zachariah’s poetic output lasted as a document of art, to reach to what he is really and what he has. The reception of this poetic output differs from one reader to another one, and from one critician to another).However, the reception of the volume was an operation makes it expresses it’s mental, aesthetic meaning then, it is a reconstruction of the expected spheres of its own readers and is a representation of the history of that era. In essence,theviews of aesthetic reception put light on many of it’s beauty and literary character, though these views didn’t give it the right of horizontal symmetry which characterized a lot of thriving classical works and that realized its achievements, despite of all obstacles. If these later,reuine literature as values as norms; literature remains-in my opinion-this body carries within it’s specific individuality; so that it is “a mirror of people” and I can justify my opinion by the fact that the characteristics of the text are represented in its refusal of primitive values and laws. These characteristics tried to be independents. In fact, the new literature is only a mirror of this society of materialism, deeply spilt and divided. Because words are like filled weapons, just as what jean Paul Sartre said, the words of Zachariah were truly like that, arms against injustice, colonization.